Wouldn’t it be simpler, to create a corresponding document, and link to it instead of repeating always the same statements – which, by the way, are of quite limited benefit for most users here – especially, because we know, that you are definitely completely unexperienced in using Muse. As someone, who assisted hundreds and hundreds of Muse users, I am really fed up, reading in every second post the same mantras. Why doubling his statement? Are you paid for the amount of posts or are you trying to freeze us out of this forum by drowning us in ever-same contributions?īut never mind: I am not far away from leaving this forum, not because of its members, but in consequence of these everlasting and never ending deja vus. Yes, Nancy, Uwe already mentioned, that „you may need an html editor“.
But I cannot in good conscience recommend starting new projects with Muse because it has no future. If people want to keep using Muse, that is their choice.
Adobe muse websites code#
Unless I see an official announcement to the contrary, I will continue to mention DW because it is, as of this writing, the only code editor in Adobe's product line. According to Preran, Adobe has no plans to end DW development. I don't know which post you're referring to.
We don't know the answer to either question. If the designer didn't provide client with a MU data file, this project is pretty much over unless the client or a staff member can work with the native code. The site was abandoned before it was completed. In this case, the website is already finished and published. He is not alone, as you know from my side.Īlthough MUSE is under EOL it could be used for easy websites for quite a long time, though.īTW, ALWAYS if I see, there´s a new muse user, i mention that MUSE is under EOL and to look for another app. If you were a muse user you would understand much better, why Günter Heißenbüttel is "grumbling". The most easiest way would be, of course, to get the original muse file from the designer. Yes, I didn`t mention any, because this won`t help in this case, as there´s already a website, done with muse.įrom the OP we know that they are not webdesigners but clients of a designer, so what should they start to code websites?
If you name DW you should be fair that this might maybe be as well under EOL pretty soon (mentioned in this forum recently).Īlso the tutorials for DW are sad, frankly speaking – no muse user without proper coding skills will understand any of them.,
0 kommentar(er)
